Agri-biotechnology Agriculture Policy Biodiversity Bt cotton GM Crops

Blending Non-Bt with Bt Cottonseeds to Delay Insect Resistance: Govt Anxious About Lax Standards

Bollworms were able to defeat synthetic pyrethroids in just seven years. Bt technology providers do want a repeat of the experience. To prevent the emergence of resistant bollworms, they want farmers to plant refuge crops, which the insects can feed on and multiply. But farmers are resisting the obligation. Amending the Seed Act, however, to supply blended seeds so farmers do not have an option is a fraught exercise reports Vivian Fernandes.

Shivendra-Bajaj-Refuge-Story-Std

Shivendra Bajaj, Executive Director, ABLE-AG

Thirteen years after genetically-modified Bt cotton was approved for cultivation, seed companies are anxious about prolonging its resistance to bollworms. A second workshop held on Tuesday, 8 December 2015 in Delhi within the span of a year on insect resistance management (IRM), underscores the worry of regulators, farmers, agricultural scientists and the seed industry, represented by thirteen member companies (agricultural focus group) of the Association of Biotech-led Enterprises (ABLE-AG).

Bollworms are one of the most destructive pests known to cotton. By boring into pods, and remaining beyond the reach of pesticides, they wreck havoc on the crop.

And they are quite resilient.

Mayee-Cropped

C D Mayee

Since 2002, when it was approved for cultivation in India, Bt cotton has been able to hold their predation in check. It does so by incorporating, through genetic engineering, a toxin derived from a soil bacterium in tissues which the pest feeds on. But it is a losing battle. There is always a competition between attacker and host, says CD Mayee, former director of Nagpur’s Central Institute of Cotton Research (CICR), and a plant pathologist. The battle lasts longer for pathogens, he says, but insects keep the fight short and win. ‘If it (the bollworm) can down pyrethroids, one of the best molecules of insecticides in just seven years, I think Bt is nothing for the bollworm to really (put) down.’

Seeking to control pests, in other words, is futile; managing them is wiser goal.

To delay resistance, Indian regulators require growers to plant twenty percent of the cotton area, or five rows around the Bt crop with non-Bt cotton for the pests to feed on and multiply. ‘There is enough scientific evidence that resistance can be delayed if there is a refuge area,’ says S Raghavendra Rao, Adviser in the Department of Biotechnology.  China, he says, dispensed with refuge areas. As bollworms can feed on a variety of plants, the Chinese reckoned they would survive on wild vegetation. But they have revised that opinion, he says.

S-R-Rao-Cropped

S Raghavendra Rao

Indian seed companies supply non-Bt seeds with every packet of Bt seed they sell, But most farmers care more for yield that sustainability. They see plants grown only for pests to feed on as a waste and do not comply with the practice. Seed companies with equally short vision, or frayed scruples, also provide non-Bt seed as a formality; complaints about seeds that do not germinate are rife. ‘More than insect resistance I am worried about best practices,’ says Rao.

The first approved variety of Bt cotton ─Bollgard I ─ has become ineffective against the American bollworm. A second variety with two Bt genes called Bollgard II was approved in 2006 and is now the standard. Besides American bollworm, it is effective against pink and spotted bollworms as well.

To reduce the pain of compliance, seed companies are prevailing on the government to reduce non-Bt planting to five percent. They cite South Africa, Australia, the United States and Brazil as examples. Gurjeet Singh Mann, a farmer, questions the very need for refuge area in the Indian context where farmers grow a variety of crops and not just cotton unlike in the west where vast tracts have a single crop.  Fallow areas, or pigeon pea and chick pea crops, can host bollworms, he says.

Mayee provides this argument qualified support. Refuge areas, he says, should not be prescribed for cotton farmers with kerchief-sized plots in rain-dependent areas like Vidarbha and Marathwada in Maharashtra. If regulators agree with his proposition, sixty-five percent of India’s cotton acreage will escape the obligation. Refuge areas should be prescribed for contiguous and irrigated cotton belts in Punjab and Haryana and parts of Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat, he avers.

To deny farmers an option seed companies want the government to allow non-Bt seeds to be mixed with Bt seed. Blending will ensure compliance, they assert. But farmers will have to be educated so they do not uproot bollworm- infested plants, or regard them as a sign of adulteration, says Vipin Dagaonkar of Bayer CropScience. He estimates that reducing the refuge requirement to five percent would cut the annual requirement of non-Bt seed by 4,500 tonnes.

JSSandhuICAR-Square

J S Sandhu

GurmeetMann-Farmer-Square

Gurjeet Singh Mann

‘We are with you in implementing a refuge strategy,’ assures J S Sandhu, Director-General, Crop Science, at the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). ‘We want the technology to last longer.’  Climate change has made management of resistance difficult, he admits, and points to the whitefly outbreak in Punjab earlier this year. He seeks actionable recommendations for ICAR and the ministry of agriculture.

But blending will hit the hurdle of the Seed Act. Though Bt cotton hybrids are non-notified and do not come within the ambit of the Act, the law brings all seeds with the purview of the Essential Commodities Act (ECA). If minimum standards with regard to germination and genetic purity are not maintained, ECA penalties will kick in, says J S Chauhan, Additional Director-General, Seeds, at ICAR.

Given the political opposition to plant genetic modification (GM) technology, amending the Seed Act will be a fraught exercise. Anti-GM activists will paint it as a concession to corporates and multinationals. But delay will hasten the development of resistance and provide the activists yet another excuse to deride a technology which they anyways regard as redundant.

Insects seem to have figured out competing antagonisms in the Indian political system and are manipulating them in the evolutionary game of survival.

So the next time you call someone ‘Insect!’ remember you may be swatting intelligent life.

(Top photo: BLENDED: Participants of ABLE-AG’s workshop on refuge strategy for bollworms to delay resistance to Bt cotton.  Photo by Mukesh Kumar.  All other photos by Vivian Fernandes)

Your comments are solicited. You may post them on the website or write to smartindianagriculture@gmail.com

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?