Contract farming

New Draft Model Contract Farming Act Creates Bureaucracy, Encourages Farmers to Not Perform, says Policy Analyst

By proposing to protect farmers with a pre-agreed price, the new draft model contract farming act incentivizes farmers not to perform, says a policy analyst and consultant to the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP). The entire premise of the act is to create a legal infrastructure for honouring contract farming agreements. This approach is flawed, says Smriti Sharma, the analyst in an article published in the Mint.

Rather than binding buyers and sellers in an “inconvenient marriage,” the act should strive to prevent contract failures, she says. She warns of monopsony, or many farmers selling to a single buyer, which can leave farmers in a take-it-or-leave-it situation. Information asymmetry can also lead to undesirable outcomes. Contracted farmers can renege on commitments if they get higher prices elsewhere. They may also not understand the terms of the contract, especially the specified quality parameters, which may allow the contracting firm to not honour the agreement to buy, or to buy at a less-than-agreed price. Or the quality contracted may not find other buyers. For example, potatoes grown for making chips and wafers are not the same as those sold in the open market for making sabzi, as they have low water content and high solid matter. This makes the contracting farmers dependent on a single or few buyers.

Sharma also faults the model act for proposing a Contract Farming (Development and Facilitation) Authority with whom all contract farming agreements will have to be registered. This is an additional procedure and cost, she says.

Rather, the model act should try to create an enabling environment by being a repository of information about farmers and farmers producer organisations which are willing to get into contract farming arrangements, the area of land they own, how much of it is available for contracting, the quality of the land, the default rate and so on. Government can also specify standards for crops and enforce them. It can create contract templates with standard features that enable risk-sharing and create incentives for the parties to act in good faith.

(Top photo by Vivian Fernandes of potatoes on contract to French fry maker McCain being harvested at Iqbalgarh in Banaskantha district of Gujarat).


Leave a Comment

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?