Agriculture Policy Biodiversity GM Crops

National Academy of Ag Sciences Passes Resolution for Immediate Release of GM Mustard; Writes to PM

Agricultural scientists are telling the government to stop dithering and start deciding. They are dismayed at the government’s delay in endorsing the regulator’s recommendation for release of GM mustard. “We are just presenting facts and not pressuring the government,” the DG-ICAR said. Vivian Fernandes reports on their bold move.

The National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) has urged central and state governments to act upon the recommendations of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) and approve the release of genetically-modified (GM) mustard before the coming planting season so that seeds are available to farmers for sowing in their fields in winter.

In a resolution passed at its annual general meeting, the academy said the GM mustard hybrid DMH-11, which GEAC recommended for release on 11 May, has “fully met the regulatory, bio-safety and performance requirements” and so, should not be denied to farmers.

The resolution said the country must have faith in its scientific and regulatory agencies. “We have apprised ourselves of the of all the conducted studies and unequivocally state that this technology is as safe as non-GE (genetically engineered) mustard. “India’s multi-tiered regulatory system “is one of the most robust… in the world” it said.

The academy said it was “deeply concerned about unscientific and ill-motivated attacks on the use of GM mustard hybrid.”

GM mustard, it said will help improve farmers’ incomes and reduce dependence on imports of cooking oil.

The resolution urged the government to actively support agricultural scientists to pursue frontier sciences. It said delays in decision-making will only dishearten and de-motivate the scientific community.

A copy of the resolution has been sent to the Prime Minister.

The academy comprises 625 fellows. At the AGM on Monday, 5 June, about 200 fellows were present and they unanimously endorsed the resolution, NAAS President Panjab Singh said.

In a press conference that followed, Trilochan Mohapatra, the Director-General of Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) said he was not bothered about criticism that the yield of DMH-11 was not as high as claimed. The transgenic technology in it would allow breeders to develop “far more heterotic (better yielding) hybrids” than conventional technology.

He praised Bt cotton, the only GM crop allowed for cultivation in India. It has raised yields and farmers’ incomes and made India an exporter of cotton. It had also been kind on the environment because the use of pesticides on cotton, which was 33 percent of the total used in India, has come down to 10 percent and most of it was for control of sucking pests (which is not targeted by the toxic transgene in Bt cotton).  In short, agri-biotechnology was good for the country.

K V Prabhu, Joint-Director (Research) at Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) likened the transgenic technology in DMH-11 to a “road on  which other hybrids could ride.”  It was faster in creating more hybrids of greater purity than conventional, cytoplasmic male sterility, system he said.

Panjab Singh said GM canola (which is a variety of mustard or rapeseed that has low erucic acid and low glucosinolate content (which gives mustard it pungency) has been used since 1996 when it was approved for cultivation in Canada. So there is long-term proof of its safety. He said mustard is the most important crop for small and marginal farmers. It productivity is low, about 1.1 tonnes per hectare, and has remained stagnant. DMH-11 has 25-30 percent higher yield, so it would improve farmers’ incomes and reduce India’s dependence on imported oil. “People objecting are those who do not understand the science,” he said.

C D Mayee, President of South Asia Biotechnology Centre (SABC) said India’s annual cooking oil requirement was about 24 million tonnes. Of this about 6-9 million tonnes is met domestically. The rest is imported. Of this 2.5 million tonnes is GM soybean oil, 1.4 million tonnes is GM cottonseed oil and 1.5 million tonnes is GM canola.

Even the cottonseed oil produced in India is from GM seeds, he said.

Deepak Pental, geneticist and former vice-chancellor of Delhi University, who lead the team that developed DMH-11, those who claimed it would affect the production of honey. On the contrary, being higher yielding, it would put out more flowers for bees to feed on.  Prabhu said though the pollen the bees fed on would have transgenic proteins, tests have shown they did not affect them.

As for the herbicide tolerance, Prabhu said a herbicide was sprayed on mustard fields before weeds emerged. One of three transgenes  inserted in DMH-11 made it tolerant to glufosinate ammonium, a contact herbicide which could be used only during a 15-30 day window when mustard was most sensitive to weeds.

Pental said countries like Germany which fund opposition to GM crop technology use a much larger quantity of herbicides proportionately than India. He said glufosinate was not a cheap herbicide, so farmers would it sparingly even if the government permitted its use on mustard. The hybrid is not tolerant to glyphosate, which is the herbicide that is cheap and most used.

Worldwide, of 33 million hectares under mustard and rapeseed, 8.5 million in Australia, Canada and USA is under the GM version. If India approved the cultivation of the transgenic hybrid, it would add 6.6 million hectares to the global tally.

(NAAS press con on GM mustard. Photo by Vivian Fernandes)

Leave a Comment

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?