Agriculture Policy Briefing

ICRISAT’s DG Takes a Swipe at Subhash Palekar’s Zero-Budget Natural Farming at NAAS Lecture

Subhash Palekar’s Zero-Budget Natural Farming came in for criticism tangentially from Peter Carberry, Director-General of the Hyderabad-based ICRISAT, while delivering the foundation day lecture of the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) in New Delhi on 5 June. He was speaking on the theme, “Can India’s success in agriculture benefit Africa?”

Carberry said Palekar’s prescription of 10 kg of cow dung per acre per month would provide plants with 10 kg of nitrogen per hectare (2.5 acres) per year which was “clearly inadequate.” The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) defined “Zero-Budget’ as the practice of agriculture “without using any credit, and without spending any money on purchased inputs.” If Palekar’s practice complied with the FAO definition, it would result in such a low yield as to make agriculture unprofitable.

Carberry also decried Palekar’s anti-science stance and dismissal of “Agricultural University and their technology,” when modern agriculture had not only kept the world largely fed but also adapted for the future with innovations.

Palekar is a Padma Shri awardee. His method of farming has been officially adopted by Andhra Pradesh. Rajiv Kumar, the Vice-Chairman of NITI Aayog has lauded it in a two-part article in the Business Standard. Elaborating on the points he had made in an email exchange, Carberry said ‘the foundations of any recommended practice should be based on evidence and preferably that evidence should be available before making the recommendations and that science provides the protocols to review and critique.”

Palekar’s method has not been scientifically evaluated. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) set up a committee in April to examine its claims. Trials on ZBNF are being conducted at the Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Pantnagar University, Haryana Agricultural University, and Punjab Agricultural University.

The committee’s terms of reference are (a) to review the research results of ZBNF, (b) examine the merits and weaknesses and suggest measures for validation of results at research farms and farmers’ fields, (c) examine the expected impact of promoting ZBNF on a large-scale on soil health, productivity, food production, livelihoods and sustainability of agriculture in India, and (d) make suitable suggestions for converging scientific farming practices with those of ZBNF.

At a brainstorming session at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) last November, Palekar was told not to use the term Zero-Budget Natural Farming, as it was misleading. Instead, it was suggested that he use the term Subhash Palekar’s Natural Farming.

“The initial findings are not in favour,” an official in the committee said.

Himachal Governor Acharya Devvrat is a votary of Subhash Palekar’s practice. According to the official cited above, he found the composition of the ICAR committee biased against it. At his suggestion, the committee has been expanded to include persons who have a positive view of SPNF.

(Photo: Peter Carberry. Photo courtesy ICRISAT)

Leave a Comment

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?