Agri-biotechnology Agriculture Policy Briefing

GEAC to Ask Deepak Pental for GM Mustard to be Tested on Honeybees: Release Decision Effectively Postponed to the Next Government

Having recommended release of GM mustard to farmers last May, the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) should have told environment minster Harsh Vardhan it has no reason to reconsider the adverse representations. The minister would have been forced to take a decision either for or against. The GEAC has given him wiggle room and bailed this government out, reports Vivian Fernandes  

After a gap of nine months the GEAC met on 21 March. GM mustard was one of the items on the agenda. Despite the GEAC recommending approval for cultivation to the environment minister last May, Harsh Vardhan has not taken a decision. Instead, he wanted the GEAC to review the representations he had received against the genetically-modified hybrid, even though it had given ample time to the anti-GM activists and had decided that the technology was safe, an advancement over conventional methods of producing mustard hybrids and therefore beneficial for both farmers and the nation.

To allay any residual fears about damage to the environment, the GEAC has decided to ask the developers, that is, geneticist Deepak Pental and his team of scientists from Delhi University to conduct a trial on the impact on honeybees. The GEAC had earlier recommended this post-release of the mustard hybrid. Now it will be done before. This will have to happen during the coming winter season and will require the GM mustard field to be isolated from other mustard areas.

Effectively  a decision on GM mustard has been postponed to the next government. Supporters of GM mustard will see this as a setback though the more optimistic among them will be gratified that the issue has not been shelved.

There is no scientific reason to hold back release of GM mustard. All the protocols have been followed and it has been declared safe.  Harsh Vardhan either does not support the technology or he does not want to take on lobbies like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch.

The twists and turns that GM mustard has had to negotiate makes one wonder whether scientific evidence at all informs decision-making in this government.

(Top photo of Deepak Pental’s experimental mustard plat at Delhi’s University’s South Campus by Vivian Fernandes).

Leave a Comment

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?