Agri-biotechnology Agriculture Policy Bt cotton

FSII Expresses “Deep Concern” at Maharashtra Govt’s Statements to Hold Seed Companies Liable for Losses Arising from Pink Bollworm Resistance

The Federation of Seed Industry of India (FSII), the breakaway group from the National Seed Association of India (NSAI), has written to the union and Maharashtra agriculture ministries regarding resistance of pink bollworm (PBW) to Mahyco Monsanto Biotech’s BG-II, genetically-modified insect resistant Bt cotton technology. Maharashtra’s Principal Secretary (Agriculture) Bijay Kumar has said that BG-II should be denotified in view of extensive PBW resistance to BG-II in the state. Separately, the All India Kisan Sabha, a Communist Party of India organization, and NSAI, led by M Prabhakara Rao of Nuziveedu Seeds — whose Bt cottonseed  franchise MMB has terminated for non-payment of trait-fee dues — have demanded that the trait fee of Rs 49 per packet of 450 grams of BG-II cottonseed be scrapped.  Maharashtra has held seed companies liable for losses arising from PBW attack.

FSII says, “This is unfortunate and not an accurate assessment of the issue and holding the seed companies responsible for some of these outcomes is not only unfair but also in contravention to the principles of natural justice.” Its letter, it says, is an effort to bring to the fore the real reasons of the problem that, if addressed, can help mitigate this problem.

The PBW attacks, it says, were observed in some areas of Maharashtra in the kharif season. On the basis of its investigation, it says: (a) Bt cotton trait is approved primarily for the control of American bollworm. The control
of spotted bollworm, army worm and pink bollworm were additional features of the technology. Even now the control of all the above bollworms, especially American bollworm has been “excellent”, except for the recent phenomenon of the attack of PBW in certain areas. This fact is reflected in the increasing demand for Bt cottonsseed.

(b) When Bt technology was introduced in 2002, PBW was not a major pest in cotton, except in some pockets of Punjab and Haryana. When one pest goes down due to control by a pesticide or a GM trait, it is natural for other pests to increase due to a lack of competition.

(c) Resistance management is a scientific process with all technologies that target pests in plants or microbes in human beings or animals. A major factor for resistance development in PBW is due to non-adherence to the regulatory guideline of planting non-Bt refuge  cotton by farmers (for bollworms to feed on). It is also dependent on the quality of non-Bt refuge seeds supplied by some companies.

(d) It is difficult to establish that yield loss, if any, is due to attack of PBW. FSII says, it is an “established scientific fact” that crop yields depend on multiple factors, including environment, crop rotation, crop cultivation practices, choice of germplasm, pest biology and genetic purity.  It is also a fact, it says, that adequate methods of controlling PBW are available to farmers. FSII’s understanding is that in most of the areas PBW numbers are below the economic threshold level (ETL).

(e) PBW management continues to be implemented in an “excellent” manner by the Gujarat government in the last two years with “extremely satisfactory results”. It is very important to transfer this knowledge from Gujarat to other states.

(f) No technology or product can be effective for all times, FSII says. That is why continuous research and development of new products is important.

FSII believes that effective stewardship of Bt cotton includes (a) Maintaining adequate trait purity of the seed, (b) Ensuring the quality of non-Bt refuge seed and (c) Ensuring relevant insect resistance management practices,

The letter also states that to drive adoption of good practices, member companies are engaging in outreach, such as: (a) Farmer education programs on clean cultivation, refuge planting, scouting for bollworms and spraying based on ETL levels. (b) Distribution and installation of pheromone traps for mass trapping of adult moths to arrest further multiplication and spread.  (c) Persuading farmers to destroy stubble and harvested stalks to kill hibernating PBW larvae or pupae. (d) Engagement with ginners for timely destruction of seed cotton waste, to arrest off- field  multiplication of PBW. (e) Farmer awareness on agronomy management, crop termination and crop management. (f) Introduction of refuge-in-bag (RIB),  (that is mixing non-Bt cottonseed with Bt cottonseed instead of giving it in a separate pouch), for the coming season. This will ensure better compliance of refugia requirements by farmers.

The letter also states that collaborative efforts with stakeholders by members have yielded satisfactory results across states, especially in Gujarat. It expresses “deep concern” at the statements of the Maharashtra government that it will tell seed companies to compensate farmers. This, if implemented, may lead to closure of the industry. FSII claims.

(Top photo: Pink bollworm) 

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?